Consultation Report — Research Service Example

Summary of Your Consultation

This report explains, in plain words, how we understood your study and how we plan to analyse it. It is based only on the data and the materials you sent us. For each hypothesis (a statement about your study that the analysis checks) in your study we plan a statistical test (a standard calculation that checks whether a pattern in your data is larger than chance alone would produce). Each section below explains one part of the plan, and the section “Decisions we made for you” lists every choice we made on your behalf, so you can check it before you approve.

ItemDetail
Things your study measures5
Hypotheses we will test3
Statistical tests planned3
How confident we are in this planHigh: we understood your study well

What your study measures: work_arrangement, tenure, job_autonomy, supervisor_support, work_engagement

Decisions We Made for You

A statistical consultant decides whatever your materials and data already make clear, and explains each decision. These are the decisions we made on our own, and what each one is based on. If anything here does not match what you know about your study, tell us before you approve the quote and we will change it.

How we understood your study

For each thing your study measures: the part it plays in your study and what kind of answers it holds. Together these decide which test fits each hypothesis.

Checking Your Data File

We opened your data file and checked that it can be read in full.

ItemDetail
The file could be readYes
Rows (usually one per respondent)360
Columns (usually one per question or detail)17

The Files You Sent

Each file you uploaded, and what we understood it to be.

FileWhat it isVersion notesHow sure we are
data.csvData—Certain
study-brief.mdInstructions—Likely
questionnaire.docxQuestionnaire—Certain
codebook.mdInstructions—Certain

Your Questions and How We Score Them

Every column of your data that is part of your study: the question it holds, the measure it belongs to, and whether its scoring is reversed (see “Decisions we made for you”).

QuestionColumn in your fileGroup of questionsScoring reversed
Work arrangementd1—No
Tenure with the employerd2—No
I have freedom to choose how to carry out my tasks.q1_1job_autonomyNo
I can decide the order of tasks during my workday.q1_2job_autonomyNo
I have discretion in choosing how to solve a work problem.q1_3job_autonomyNo
I can adapt my work method to the needs of a task.q1_4job_autonomyNo
I can make decisions about my day-to-day work.q1_5job_autonomyNo
My supervisor is available when I need help.q2_1supervisor_supportNo
My supervisor gives feedback that helps me in my work.q2_2supervisor_supportNo
My supervisor takes the difficulties I raise seriously.q2_3supervisor_supportNo
My supervisor supports me in dealing with workload.q2_4supervisor_supportNo
I can rely on my supervisor when a professional difficulty arises.q2_5supervisor_supportNo
I feel energetic while working.q3_1work_engagementNo
I find my work tasks interesting.q3_2work_engagementNo
I feel committed to putting effort into my work.q3_3work_engagementNo
I am absorbed in my work while carrying out a task.q3_4work_engagementNo
I feel enthusiastic about my work.q3_5work_engagementNo

How We Name Your Columns

How each column of your data file is called in this report, what it belongs to, and the part it plays in your study.

Column in your fileName in this reportWhat it belongs toIts part in the study
d1Work arrangementwork_arrangementan explaining factor
d2Tenure with the employertenurean explaining factor
q1_1I have freedom to choose how to carry out my tasks.job_autonomya question in a group
q1_2I can decide the order of tasks during my workday.job_autonomya question in a group
q1_3I have discretion in choosing how to solve a work problem.job_autonomya question in a group
q1_4I can adapt my work method to the needs of a task.job_autonomya question in a group
q1_5I can make decisions about my day-to-day work.job_autonomya question in a group
q2_1My supervisor is available when I need help.supervisor_supporta question in a group
q2_2My supervisor gives feedback that helps me in my work.supervisor_supporta question in a group
q2_3My supervisor takes the difficulties I raise seriously.supervisor_supporta question in a group
q2_4My supervisor supports me in dealing with workload.supervisor_supporta question in a group
q2_5I can rely on my supervisor when a professional difficulty arises.supervisor_supporta question in a group
q3_1I feel energetic while working.work_engagementa question in a group
q3_2I find my work tasks interesting.work_engagementa question in a group
q3_3I feel committed to putting effort into my work.work_engagementa question in a group
q3_4I am absorbed in my work while carrying out a task.work_engagementa question in a group
q3_5I feel enthusiastic about my work.work_engagementa question in a group
job_autonomyJob autonomyjob_autonomya combined score
supervisor_supportSupervisor supportsupervisor_supporta combined score
work_engagementWork engagementwork_engagementa combined score

Groups of Questions and Their Consistency

Your questionnaire has groups of questions that together measure one thing (each such group is called a scale). For each group: how many questions it has, how many of them are scored in reverse, and the range of answers.

Group of questionsQuestionsScored in reverseRange of answers
job_autonomy501–5
supervisor_support501–5
work_engagement501–5

For every group whose range of answers is known, the analysis calculates its reliability (a number between 0 and 1, called Cronbach's alpha, that shows how consistently a group of questions measures one thing; the higher, the better).

Your Hypotheses and the Tests We Plan

The table below shows, for each hypothesis, which test we plan, what the test checks, and how strictly its result will be judged.

HypothesisWhat it is aboutPlanned testWhat the test checksHow strictly it is judged
H1 H1: Job autonomy is positively associated with work engagement.a link between two measuresPearson correlationMeasures how strongly two numeric measures move together, and in which direction.Main hypothesis: stricter check
H2 H2: Autonomy and supervisor support jointly predict engagement in a multiple linear regression compared with an intercept-only model.predicting an outcomeMultiple linear regressionEstimates how well several measures together predict an outcome, and how much each one adds.Main hypothesis: stricter check
H3 H3: Mean engagement is higher in the hybrid group than in the onsite group.a difference between groupsIndependent-samples t-testCompares the average score of two separate groups (for example, women and men).Main hypothesis: stricter check

When several hypotheses are tested, we apply a correction for testing several hypotheses (when several hypotheses are tested, one of them can look convincing by chance alone; the correction makes each test slightly stricter to prevent that). Your main hypotheses get the stricter version (the Holm method); exploratory ones a lighter one (the Benjamini-Hochberg method). Which group a hypothesis belongs to depends only on where it came from, never on its result, and it is fixed in the analysis plan before any test runs. If a hypothesis is in the wrong group, now is the time to tell us.

Your Options, by What You Need

These options are arranged by the purpose you told us about (academic work): what is enough for a basic write-up, what we recommend for a thorough piece of work, and what you can add as an extension.

You can remove any selected test you do not want; its price is taken off and the quote is recalculated. A test marked “used only if the conditions are not met” is part of the test it replaces and is removed together with it, not on its own.

Enough for a basic write-up

TestHypothesisKindWhat it doesYour decision
Pearson correlationH1The test we selectedMeasures how strongly two numeric measures move together, and in which direction.Not decided yet
Multiple linear regressionH2The test we selectedEstimates how well several measures together predict an outcome, and how much each one adds.Not decided yet
Independent-samples t-testH3The test we selectedCompares the average score of two separate groups (for example, women and men).Not decided yet

Recommended for a thorough piece of work

TestHypothesisKindWhat it doesYour decision
Spearman correlationH1Used only if the conditions are not metRuns instead of the Pearson correlation only if your data do not meet that test's conditions. Measures how strongly two measures move together when the answers are rankings or are unevenly spread.Not decided yet
Mann-Whitney U testH3Used only if the conditions are not metRuns instead of the Independent-samples t-test only if your data do not meet that test's conditions. Compares two separate groups when the answers are rankings or are unevenly spread, by checking which group tends to score higher.Not decided yet

Checking the Conditions of Each Test

Every test relies on a few assumptions (conditions a test needs from the data, for example that the scores are spread in a roughly bell-shaped way) about the data. We check them before any result is reported. If a condition is not met, a suitable alternative test that was chosen in advance runs instead, and we tell you.

Missing Answers and Number of Respondents

During the analysis we confirm, for each hypothesis, how many respondents can be included — the sample size (the number of respondents whose answers can be analysed). Missing answers (questions a respondent left unanswered) are handled by a rule fixed in advance; no respondent is removed without a recorded reason.

Respondents in your data file: 360

Unusual Answers

During the analysis we look for outliers (answers that lie far from all the others, such as a typing mistake) with a method suited to each test. Whatever we find is reported to you, and no answer is removed without a recorded reason.

Points to Confirm About Your Files and Names

There is nothing to confirm about your files or column names.